<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ldt</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Лучевая диагностика и терапия</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2079-5343</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Baltic Medical Education Center</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">ldt-15</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ЧТО НОВОГО В КРИТЕРИЯХ ОЦЕНКИ ОНКОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ЗАБОЛЕВАНИЙ В ЛУЧЕВОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКЕ: RECIST vs. PERCIST?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>WHAT'S NEW IN CANCER EVALUATION CRITERIA IN MEDICAL IMAGING: RECIST vs PERCIST?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гележе</surname><given-names>Павел Борисович</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gelezhe</surname><given-names>P. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">pgelezhe@emcmos.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Морозов</surname><given-names>С. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Morozov</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мандельблат</surname><given-names>Ю. Э.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mandelblat</surname><given-names>Yu. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Либсон</surname><given-names>Е. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Libson</surname><given-names>E. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И. М. Сеченова; Европейский медицинский центр</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>I.M.Sechenov First Moscow state medical university; European Medical Center</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Европейский медицинский центр</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>European Medical Center</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Гележе П.Б., Морозов С.П., Мандельблат Ю.Э., Либсон Е.И., 2014</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гележе П.Б., Морозов С.П., Мандельблат Ю.Э., Либсон Е.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gelezhe P.V., Morozov S.P., Mandelblat Y.E., Libson E.I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://radiag.bmoc-spb.ru/jour/article/view/15">https://radiag.bmoc-spb.ru/jour/article/view/15</self-uri><abstract><p>Оценка ответа опухоли на терапию является одной из важных задач лучевой диагностики в онкологии. До момента широкого внедрения в начале 80-х годов XX века в клиническую практику томографических методов исследования не существовало точных способов дооперационной оценки размеров опухоли. Первыми стали критерии оценки ответа опухоли на терапию WHO, разработанные Всемирной Организацией Здравоохранения в 1979 году. Выявление недостатков критериев WHO, ограничивающих применение в онкологической практике, привело к созданию более точных систем RECIST 1.0 и 1.1. С появлением новых схем химиотерапии изменились подходы к анализу ответа опухолей, благодаря чему был разработан ряд специфических критериев, предназначенных для определенных гистологических типов злокачественных новообразований. С развитием ПЭТ/КТ большее внимание стало уделяться возможности количественной оценки метаболического статуса опухоли в процессе лечения, что было реализовано в системе критериев PERCIST 1.0. Широкое использование PERCIST 1.0 позволяет с новой стороны оценить процессы опухолевого ответа, и, как следствие, результаты противоопухолевой терапии в целом.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Evaluation of tumor treatment response plays an important role in oncology. There were no precise methods for preoperative assessment of tumor size until the wide introduction of CT and MRI. WHO criteria were introduced in 1979 were the first, but they had considerable limitations. It was the reason for creation of the relevant RECIST 1.0 and 1.1. With invention of new chemotherapy protocols approaches to treatment response assessment were changed. Therefore, new criteria of response to therapy for some specific histological types of malignant tumors were developed. During the last few years, a necessity for developing specific treatment response criteria using PET/CT emerged; PERCIST 1.0 criteria are a useful tool for evaluation of tumor response by PET/CT. Wide usage of PERCIST 1.0 allows improved assessment of therapy response in general.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Онкология</kwd><kwd>лимфома</kwd><kwd>ПЭТ/КТ</kwd><kwd>RECIST</kwd><kwd>PERCIST</kwd><kwd>Oncology</kwd><kwd>lymphoma</kwd><kwd>PET-CT</kwd><kwd>RECIST</kwd><kwd>PERCIST</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ширяев С. В. Перспективы клинического применения позитронной эмиссионной томографии в онкологии / С. В. Ширяев, Б. И. Долгушин, А. В. Хмелев // Медицинская физика.- 2005.- № 2.- С. 77-83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ширяев С. В. Перспективы клинического применения позитронной эмиссионной томографии в онкологии / С. В. Ширяев, Б. И. Долгушин, А. В. Хмелев // Медицинская физика.- 2005.- № 2.- С. 77-83.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Долгушин Б. И. Стандарты проведения КТ и МРТ исследований в онкологии с использованием внутривенного контрастного усиления / Б. И. Долгушин, И. Е. Тюрин, А. Б. Лукьянченко и др. // Лучевая диагностика и терапия.- 2010.- № 4.- С. 88-100.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Долгушин Б. И. Стандарты проведения КТ и МРТ исследований в онкологии с использованием внутривенного контрастного усиления / Б. И. Долгушин, И. Е. Тюрин, А. Б. Лукьянченко и др. // Лучевая диагностика и терапия.- 2010.- № 4.- С. 88-100.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wahl R. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors / R. Wahl, Н. Jacene, Y. Kasamon, M. Lodge // J. Nucl. Med.- 2009.- Vol. 50, № 5, Suppl.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wahl R. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors / R. Wahl, Н. Jacene, Y. Kasamon, M. Lodge // J. Nucl. Med.- 2009.- Vol. 50, № 5, Suppl.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Therasse P. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors / P. Therasse, S. G. Arbuck, E. A. Eisenhauer et al. // European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada // J. Natl. Cancer Inst.- 2000.- Vol. 92.- Р 205-216.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Therasse P. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors / P. Therasse, S. G. Arbuck, E. A. Eisenhauer et al. // European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada // J. Natl. Cancer Inst.- 2000.- Vol. 92.- Р 205-216.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bogaerts J. Individual patient data analysis to assess modifications to the RECIST criteria / J. Bogaerts, R. Ford, D. Sargent et al. // Eur. J. Cancer.- 2009.- Vol. 45 (2).- Р 248-260.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bogaerts J. Individual patient data analysis to assess modifications to the RECIST criteria / J. Bogaerts, R. Ford, D. Sargent et al. // Eur. J. Cancer.- 2009.- Vol. 45 (2).- Р 248-260.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">James K. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional vs bidimensional measurement / K. James, E. Eisenhauer, M. Christian et al. // J. Natl. Cancer Inst.- 1999.- Vol. 91(6).- Р. 523-528.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">James K. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional vs bidimensional measurement / K. James, E. Eisenhauer, M. Christian et al. // J. Natl. Cancer Inst.- 1999.- Vol. 91(6).- Р. 523-528.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Benjamin R. S. We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST / R. S. Benjamin, Н. Choi, Н. A. Macapinlac et al. // J. Clin. Oncol. - 2007.- Vol. 25.- Р 1760-1764.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Benjamin R. S. We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST / R. S. Benjamin, Н. Choi, Н. A. Macapinlac et al. // J. Clin. Oncol. - 2007.- Vol. 25.- Р 1760-1764.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Choi H. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: propos al. of new computed tomography response criteria / Н. Choi, С. Charnsangavej, S. C. Faria et al. // J. Clin. Oncol.- 2007.- Vol. 25.- Р 1753-1759.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choi H. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: propos al. of new computed tomography response criteria / Н. Choi, С. Charnsangavej, S. C. Faria et al. // J. Clin. Oncol.- 2007.- Vol. 25.- Р 1753-1759.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Llovet J. M. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma / J. M. Llovet, S. Ricci, V Mazzaferro et al. // N. Engl. J. Med.- 2008.- Vol. 359.- Р. 378-390.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Llovet J. M. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma / J. M. Llovet, S. Ricci, V Mazzaferro et al. // N. Engl. J. Med.- 2008.- Vol. 359.- Р. 378-390.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Assessment of tumor response on MR imaging after locoregional therapy / J. A. Vossen, M. Buijs, I. R. Kamel // Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.- 2006.- Vol. 9 (3).- Р 125-132.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Assessment of tumor response on MR imaging after locoregional therapy / J. A. Vossen, M. Buijs, I. R. Kamel // Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.- 2006.- Vol. 9 (3).- Р 125-132.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Llovet J. M. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular car-cinoma / J. M. Llovet, A. M. Di Bisceglie, J. Bruix et al. // J. Natl Cancer Inst.- 2008.- Vol. 100 (10).- Р 698-711.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Llovet J. M. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular car-cinoma / J. M. Llovet, A. M. Di Bisceglie, J. Bruix et al. // J. Natl Cancer Inst.- 2008.- Vol. 100 (10).- Р 698-711.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Forner A. Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable? / A. Forner, C. Ayuso, M. Varela et al. // Cancer.- 2009.- Vol. 115.- Р 616-623.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Forner A. Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable? / A. Forner, C. Ayuso, M. Varela et al. // Cancer.- 2009.- Vol. 115.- Р 616-623.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jochelson M. The significance of the residual mediatinal mass in the treated Hodgkin’s disease / М. Jochelson, Р. Mauch, J. Balikian et al. // J. Clin. Oncol.- 1985.- Vol. 3.- Р 637-640.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jochelson M. The significance of the residual mediatinal mass in the treated Hodgkin’s disease / М. Jochelson, Р. Mauch, J. Balikian et al. // J. Clin. Oncol.- 1985.- Vol. 3.- Р 637-640.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Israel O. Clinical pretreatment risk factors and Ga-67 scintigraphy early during treatment for prediction of outcome of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma / О. Israel, М. Mor, R. Epelbaum et al. // Cancer.- 2002.- Vol. 94.- Р 873-878.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Israel O. Clinical pretreatment risk factors and Ga-67 scintigraphy early during treatment for prediction of outcome of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma / О. Israel, М. Mor, R. Epelbaum et al. // Cancer.- 2002.- Vol. 94.- Р 873-878.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">MacManus M. P. Metabolic (FDG-PET) response after radical radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer correlates with patterns of failure / M. P MacManus, R. J. Hicks, J. P. Matthews et al. // Lung Cancer.- 2005.- Vol. 49.- Р 95-108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">MacManus M. P. Metabolic (FDG-PET) response after radical radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer correlates with patterns of failure / M. P MacManus, R. J. Hicks, J. P. Matthews et al. // Lung Cancer.- 2005.- Vol. 49.- Р 95-108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Duong C.P. FDG-PET status following chemoradiotherapy provides high management impact and powerful prognostic stratification in oesophageal cancer / C.P. Duong, R. J. Hicks, L. Weih et al. // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging.- 2006.- Vol. 33.- Р 770-778.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Duong C.P. FDG-PET status following chemoradiotherapy provides high management impact and powerful prognostic stratification in oesophageal cancer / C.P. Duong, R. J. Hicks, L. Weih et al. // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging.- 2006.- Vol. 33.- Р 770-778.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Young H. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations / H. Young, R. Baum, U. Cremerius et al. // Eur. Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group / Eur. J. Cancer.- 1999.- Vol. 35.- Р 1773-1782.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Young H. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations / H. Young, R. Baum, U. Cremerius et al. // Eur. Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group / Eur. J. Cancer.- 1999.- Vol. 35.- Р 1773-1782.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Juweid M. E. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: Consensus recommendations of the Imaging Subcommittee of the International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma / M. E. Juweid, S. Stroobants, O. S. Hoekstra et al. // J. Clin. Oncol. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2305.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Juweid M. E. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: Consensus recommendations of the Imaging Subcommittee of the International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma / M. E. Juweid, S. Stroobants, O. S. Hoekstra et al. // J. Clin. Oncol. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2305.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Verweij J. Cancer clinical trial outcomes: any progress in tumoursize assessment? / J. Verweij, P. Therasse, E. Eisenhauer // Eur. J. Cancer.- 2009.- Vol. 45.- Р 225-227.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Verweij J. Cancer clinical trial outcomes: any progress in tumoursize assessment? / J. Verweij, P. Therasse, E. Eisenhauer // Eur. J. Cancer.- 2009.- Vol. 45.- Р 225-227.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment.- Geneva: World Health Organization, 1979.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment.- Geneva: World Health Organization, 1979.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
