Preview

Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy

Advanced search

STUDY OF DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITIES OF FAT FRACTION MEASUREMENT WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DETECTING DECREASE IN BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH HEMOBLASTOSIS: RETROSPECTIVE DESCRIPTIVE SINGLE–CENTER

https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2026-17-1-88-95

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone strength depends on the amount of minerals, microarchitecture and the amount of organic matter, including adipose tissue. Traditional methods for assessing the amount of fat in bone marrow are invasive. Magnetic resonance imaging is noninvasive and can be used to assess the fat fraction in bone. The associations between fat fraction and bone mineral density are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE: To study the diagnostic capabilities of measuring fat fraction using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hemoblastoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of lumbar vertebrae 1–4 (IDEAL pulse sequence) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) data from 46 patients with hematological malignancies (mean age of women, 41.6±13.7 years; mean age of men, 43.7±12.3 years) were analyzed. MRI and DXA scans were performed using GE Signa Voyager and Dexxum systems respectively. The fat fraction was calculated as the ratio of the signal intensity of fat protons to water protons in lumbar vertebrae images.

Statistics: ROC analysis was used to assess the diagnostic significance of the methods. Pearson correlation analysis was used to calculate correlation. The Bland-Altman graphical method was used to calculate interobserver variability.

RESULTS: The fat fraction values for men with normal bone mineral density values were 67.8±6% (58–72%), and for women – 58.3±11% (45–68%). For men with decreased BMD the fat fraction values were 72.2±8% (61–86%), and for women – 74.1±7% (59–83%). The average difference in the signal intensity measurements from fat protons between two observers was 7%, for water protons – 8% (p<0.05). For women a moderate correlation was found between BMD and fat fraction (r=0.38, (p=0.04), a moderate correlation was found between fat fraction and age (r=0.39, (p=0.04). For men a weak correlation was found between BMD and fat fraction (r=0.26, (p=0.05). The sensitivity for a fat fraction greater than 75% with a decrease in bone mineral density was 60%, specificity 85%, accuracy 73% (p<0.05).

DISCUSSION: With decreasing bone mineral density the fat fraction increases, and with increasing age the fat fraction increases. For men with normal bone mineral density values the fat fraction is higher than for women of the same age. Low interobserver variability values indicate high reproducibility of signal intensity values calculation on IDEAL sequence images. These data are consistent with data from other studies.

CONCLUSION: In patients with hemoblastoses lumbar spine MRI supplemented with the IDEAL sequence can be used for noninvasive bone assessment, fat fraction measurement, and indirect assessment of bone mineral density loss with relatively with moderate diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility, without the need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

About the Authors

V. S. Blinov
Verkhnepyshminskaya Central City Clinical Hospital named after P. D. Borodin
Russian Federation

Vladislav S. Blinov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the X-ray diagnostic department of State Autonomous Healthcare Institution of the Sverdlovsk Region

624090, Russia, Verkhnyaya Pyshma, st. Chaykovskogo, 32



Y. S. Kitaeva
Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russia
Russian Federation

Yulia S. Kitaeva – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Assistant of the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education

620028, Ekaterinburg, st. Repina



E. A. Praskurnichiy
Russian National Research Medical University named after N. I. Pirogov
Russian Federation

Evgeniy A. Praskurnichiy – Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of Department of Therapy, Medical and Biological University Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education

117997, Moscow, st. Ostrovityanova, 1



References

1. Compston J.E. Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis // Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2010. No. 6. Р. 82–88. doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2009.259.

2. Schuit S.C., Klift M., Weel A.E. et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study // Bone. 2004. No. 34. Р. 195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001.

3. Ammann P., Rizzoli R. Bone strength and its determinants // Osteoporosis International. 2003. No. 14, Sup. 3, pp. 13–18. doi.org/10.1007/s00198-002-1345-4.

4. Griffith J.F., Yeung D.K., Ma H.T. et al. Bone marrow fat content in the elderly: A reversal of sex difference seen in younger subjects // Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012. No. 36. Р. 225–230. doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23619.

5. Justesen J., Stenderup K., Ebbesen E.N. et al. Adipocyte tissue volume in bone marrow is increased with aging and in patients with osteoporosis // Biogerontology. 2001. No. 2. Р. 165–171. doi.org/10.1023/a:1011513223894.

6. Schwartz A.V., Sigurdsson S., Hue T.F. et al. Vertebral bone marrow fat associated with lower trabecular BMD and prevalent vertebral fracture in older adults // Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2013. No. 98. Р. 2294–2300. doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3949.

7. Ergen F.B., Gulal G., Yildiz A.E. et al. Fat fraction estimation of the vertebrae in females using the T2*-IDEAL technique in detection of reduced bone mineralization level: comparison with bone mineral densitometry // Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 2014. No. 38. Р. 320–324. doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182aa4d9d.

8. Veldhuis-Vlug A.G., Rosen C.J. Clinical implications of bone marrow adiposity // Journal of Internal Medicine. 2018. No. 283 (2). Р. 121–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12718.

9. Reeder S.B., Wen Z., Yu H. et al. Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method // Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2004. No. 51. Р. 35–45. doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10675.

10. Watanabe D., Kimura T., Yanagida K. et al. Feasibility of assessing male osteoporosis using MRI IDEAL-IQ sequence of proximal femur in prostate cancer patients // The Aging Male. 2022. No. 25 (1). Р. 228–233. doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2022.2112663.

11. Huang X.C., Huang Y.L., Guo Y.T. et al. An experimental study for quantitative assessment of fatty infiltration and blood flow perfusion in quadriceps muscle of rats using IDEAL-IQ and BOLD-MRI for early diagnosis of sarcopenia // Experimental Gerontology. 2003. No. 183. Р. 112322. doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2023.112322.

12. Zhang L., Zheng Y.L., Wang R., Wang X.Q., Zhang H. Exercise for osteoporosis: A literature review of pathology and mechanism // Frontiers in immunology. 2022. No. 9. Р. 1005665. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1005665.

13. [Lukashew A.D., Akhatov A.F., Ryzhkin S.A., Mikhailov M.K., Zalaeva D.R. Application of DIXON MRI sequencing in the diagnosis of changes in the spongy substance of vertebral bodies in comparison with osteodensitometry data. Medical Visualization, 2023, No. 27 (3), pp. 76–83 (In Russ.)].

14. Zhou F., Sheng B., Lv F. Quantitative analysis of vertebral fat fraction and R2* in osteoporosis using IDEAL-IQ sequence // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2023. No. 11. Р. 1–8. doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06846-4.

15. Zhao Y., Huang M., Ding J. et al. Prediction of Abnormal Bone Density and Osteoporosis From Lumbar Spine MR Using Modified Dixon Quant in 257 Subjects With Quantitative Computed Tomography as Reference // Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019. No. 49 (2). Р. 390–399. doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26233.

16. Aoki T., Shinpei Y., Shunsuke K. et al. Quantification of bone marrow fat content using iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): reproducibility, site variation and correlation with age and menopause // British Journal of Radiology. 2016. No. 89. Р. 20150538. doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150538.

17. He J., Fang H., Li X. Vertebral bone marrow fat content in normal adults with varying bone densities at 3T magnetic resonance imaging // Acta Radiologica. 2018. No. 60 (4). Р. 509–515. doi.org/10.1177/0284185118786073.

18. Liu Z., Huang D., Jiang Y. et al. Correlation of R2* with fat fraction and bone mineral density and its role in quantitative assessment of osteoporosis // European Radiology. 2023. No. 33 (9). Р. 6001–6008. doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09599-9.

19. Zhou J., Damasceno P.F., Chachad R. et al. Automatic Vertebral Body Segmentation Based on Deep Learning of Dixon Images for Bone Marrow Fat Fraction Quantification // Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne). 2020. No. 11. Р. 612. doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00612.


Review

For citations:


Blinov V.S., Kitaeva Y.S., Praskurnichiy E.A. STUDY OF DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITIES OF FAT FRACTION MEASUREMENT WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DETECTING DECREASE IN BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH HEMOBLASTOSIS: RETROSPECTIVE DESCRIPTIVE SINGLE–CENTER. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2026;17(1):88-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2026-17-1-88-95

Views: 110

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-5343 (Print)