PERFUSION CT AND PET WITH 18F-FDG AND 18F-FCHO IN THE COMPLEX DIAGNOSIS OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate possibilities of CT-perfusion and PET methods with 18F-FDG and 18F-ftorholin in the complex diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Materials and Methods. The study included the results of PET/CT with 18F-FDG, 18F-ftorholin and CT-perfusion of the liver in 18 patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of hepatocellular carci noma (HCC). Depending on the degree of tumor differentiation, all patients were divided into 3 groups — patients with highly differentiated (6 patients), moderately differentiated (4 patients), and poorly differentiated HCC (8 patients). PET/CT with 18F-FDG was performed on an empty stomach with water load 308–501 MBq of 18F-FDG was administered intravenously for 50–60 minutes before scanning, depending on the patient’s weight. PET/CT with 18F-ftorholinom was performed 2–3 days after studies with 18F-FDG. The relaxation time was 40 minutes after administration of the radiopharmaceutical. The duration of each PET analysis was 3 minutes per slab. The accumulation levels of the radiopharmaceutical (maxSUV — standardized uptake value) were measured in the solid areas of tumor nodules, in the areas of necrosis (if available) and in the unmodified liver parenchyma. CT-perfusion was performed after the PET/CT in the single scanning with intravenous administration of «Omnipak» 300 mg/ml — 50 ml, the rate of introduction — 2,5–4 ml/s, the time from the introduction of a contrast agent till the scanning — 8 seconds, total scan time — 45 seconds. Data processing was carried out at the Siemens Multy Modality Workplace. Quantitative analysis was performed on the following parameters: BV (blood volume) — ml/100 ml, BF (blood flow) — ml/100 ml/min, ALP (arterial liver perfusion) — ml/100 ml/min, PVP (portal vein liver perfusion) — ml/100 ml/min by measuring the values in the areas of solid tumor nodules, in the areas of necrosis and in the unmodified liver parenchyma. Results. Average values of maxSUV in the group of patients with highly differentiated HCC in PET/CT with 18F-FDG and 18F-ftorholin in a solid component of tumor reached 3,51 and 18,24, respectively; in patients with moderately differentiated HCC — 3,91 and 12,32, respectively; in patients with poorly differentiated HCC — 9,58 and 9,70, respectively. Average values of CT perfusion imaging in a solid component of the tumor in the group of patients with highly differentiated HCC were the following: BF — 55,33 ml/100 ml/min, BV — 13,71 ml/100ml, ALP — 52,41 ml/100 ml/min, PVP — 10,81 ml/100 ml/min (p≤0,05), in the group of patients with moderately differentiated HCC: BF — 52,78 ml/100 ml/min, BV — 12,23 ml/100 ml, ALP — 47,26 ml/100 ml/min, PVP — 9,10 ml/100 ml/min (p≤0,05), in the solid component of poorly differentiated HCC: BF — 46,96 ml/100 ml/min, BV — 9,49 ml/100 ml, ALP — 40,54 ml/100 ml/min, PVP — 7,66 ml/100 ml/min (p≤0,05). Conclusions. Integrated use of PET with 18F-FDG and 18F-ftorholin and CT-perfusion in the single scanning increases differential diagnostic capabilities PET/CT diagnosis, allows to suggest the degree of HCC differentiation that can be used in treatment planning and predicting the course of disease.
Keywords
About the Authors
P. E. TulinRussian Federation
M. B. Dolgushin
Russian Federation
A. A. Odzharova
Russian Federation
M. A. Menkov
Russian Federation
B. M. Medvedeva
Russian Federation
S. V. Shiryaev
Russian Federation
Yu. I. Patyutko
Russian Federation
B. I. Dolgushin
Russian Federation
References
1. GLOBOCAN: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012.— IARC, 2014.
2. Bray F. et al. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008–2030): a population-based study // The lancet oncology.— 2012.— Vol. 13, № 8.— Р. 790–801.
3. Патютко Ю. И. и др. Гепатоцеллюлярный рак печени // Бюллетень медицинских интернет-конференций. Общество с ограниченной ответственностью Наука и инновации.— 2011.— Т. 1, № 6.— С. 6.
4. Чиссов В. И. Онкология: нац. руководство.— М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2008.— С. 205–212.
5. Суконко О. Г. Гепатоцеллюлярный рак. Алгоритм диагностики и ле че ния злокачественных новообразований.— Минск, 2012.— С. 12–14.
6. Подымова С. Д. Болезни печени: руководство для врачей.— М.: Медицина, 1998.
7. Bosch F. X., Ribes J., Borràs J. Epidemiology of primary liver cancer // Seminars in liver disease.— 1998.— Vol. 19, № 3.— Р. 271–285.
8. Beasley R. P. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis B virus: a prospective study of 22 707 men in Taiwan // Lancet.— 1981.— Vol. 318, № 8256.— Р. 1129–1133.
9. Highleyman L. Does Hepatocellular Carcinoma Differ in People with Hepatitis B and C? // 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting.— 2015.— С. 1.
10. Miller K. D. et al. Global Cancer Epidemiology and the Cancer Divide //Global Perspectives on Cancer: Incidence, Care, and Experience.— 2015.— С. 5.
11. Зогот С. Р. и др. Гепатоцеллюлярный рак (эпидемиология, лучевая диагностика, современные аспекты лечения) // Практиче ская медицина.— 2013.— № 2 (67).
12. Salomao M., McMillen E., Lefkowitch J. H. Recent advances in the classification of hepatocellular carcinoma // Diagnostic Histopathology.— 2012.— Vol. 18, № 1.— Р. 37–45.
13. Ершов В. А. Морфологические критерии первичного рака печени // Медицина.— 2009.— С. 204.
14. Matsui O. et al. Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply // Radiology.— 1991.— Vol. 178, № 2.— С. 493–497.
15. Bartolotta T. V. et al. Focal liver lesions: contrast-enhanced ultrasound // Abdominal imaging.— 2009.— Vol. 34, № 2.— Р. 193–209.
16. Tiferes D. A., D’Ippolito G. Liver neoplasms: imaging characterization // Radiologia Brasileira.— 2008.— Vol. 41, № 2.— Р. 119–127.
17. Mirk P. et al. Ultrasonographic patterns in hepatic hemangiomas // Journal of clinical ultrasound: JCU.— 1982.— Vol. 10, № 8.— С. 373.
18. Терновой С. К., Шахиджанова С. В. Магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике очаговых заболеваний печени (обзор литературы) // Медицинская визуализация.— 1999.
19. Лукьянченко А. Б., Медведева Б. М. Магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике и дифференциальной диагностике очаговых поражений печени // Вестник РОНЦ им. Н. Н. Блохина РАМН.— 2004.— Т. 15, № 1–2.
20. Van den Esschert J. W. et al. Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia using 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT // Europ. J. of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.— 2011.— Vol. 38, № 3.— Р. 436–440.
21. Talbot J. N. et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with PET/CT: a prospective comparison of 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-FDG in patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease // Journal of Nuclear Medicine.— 2010.— Vol. 51, № 11.— Р. 1699–1706.
22. Delbeke D. et al. Evaluation of benign vs malignant hepatic lesions with positron emission tomography // Archives of Surgery.— 1998.— Vol. 133, № 5.— Р. 510–516.
23. Тулин П. Е., Долгушин М. Б., Патютко Ю. И. и др. ПЭТ/КТ с 18F-ФДГ и 18F-холином в диагностике смешанного гепатохолангиоцеллюлярного рака. Клиническое наблюдение // Диагнос тиче ская и интервенционная радиология.— 2015.— Т. 9, № 1.— С. 91–99.
24. Кармазановский Г. Г., Шимановский Н. Л. Диагностическая эффективность нового магнитно-резонансного контрастного средства «Примовист» (гадоксетовая кислота) при выявлении первичных и вторичных опухолей печени // Мед. визуализация.— 2007.— № 6.— С. 135–143.
25. Pantoja E. Angiography in liver hemangioma // Amer. J. of Roentgenology.— 1968.— Vol. 104, № 4.— С. 874–879.
26. Zajko A. B. et al. Angiography of liver transplantation patients // Radiology.— 1985.— Vol. 157, № 2.— Р. 305–311.
27. Долгушин М. Б., Пронин И. Н., Фадеева Л. М. и др. ИП SWAN (3.0 тесла МРТ) и КТ-перфузия в комплексной оценке структурных особенностей метастазов в головной мозг и злокачественных глиом // Лучевая диагностика и терапия.— 2012.— Т. 3.— С. 41–51.
28. Meier P., Zierler K. L. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume // Journal of applied physiology.— 1954.— Vol. 6, № 12.— Р. 731–744.
29. Kety S. S., Schmidt C. F. The nitrous oxide method for the quantitative determination of cerebral blood flow in man: theory, procedure and normal values // Journal of Clinical Investigation.— 1948.— Vol. 27, № 4.— Р. 476.
30. Пронин И. Н. и др. Перфузионная КТ: исследование мозговой гемодинамики в норме // Медицинская визуализация.— 2007.— № 3.— Р. 8–12.
31. Axel L. Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis // Radiology.— 1980.— Vol. 137, № 3.— Р. 679–686.
32. Mathieu D. et al. Hepatic adenomas and focal nodular hyperplasia: dy na mic CT study // Radiology.— 1986.— Vol. 160, № 1.— Р. 53–58.
33. Miles K. A. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography // The British journal of radiology.— 1991.— Vol. 64, № 761.— Р. 409–412.
34. Rees S. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography // The British journal of radiology.— 1992.— Vol. 65, № 774.— Р. 554–555.
35. Miles K. A., Hayball M. P., Dixon A. K. Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT // Radiology.— 1993.— Vol. 188, № 2.— Р. 405–411.
36. Kuang Y. Positron emission tomography imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma with radiolabeled choline.— Case Western Reserve University, 2009.— Р. 38–48.
37. Pritchard P. H., Vance D. E. Choline metabolism and phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis in cultured rat hepatocytes // Biochem. J.— 1981.— Vol. 196.— Р. 261–267.
38. Yamamoto Y. et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using 11C-choline PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET // Journal of Nuclear Medicine.— 2008.— Vol. 49, № 8.— С. 1245–1248.
39. Paudyal B. et al. Clinicopathological presentation of varying 18F-FDG uptake and expression of glucose transporter 1 and hexokinase II in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma // Annals of nuclear medicine.— 2008.— Vol. 22, № 1.— С. 83–86.
40. Hwang K. H. et al. Evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas using [11C] acetate and [18F] FDG PET/CT: A preliminary study // Applied Radiation and Isotopes.— 2009.— Vol. 67, № 7.— Р. 1195–1198.
41. Sorensen M. et al. The potential use of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-Dgalactose as a PET/CT tracer for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma // Eurор. J. of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.— 2011.— Vol. 38, № 9.— С. 1723–1731.
42. Lee J. D. et al. Different glucose uptake and glycolytic mechanisms between hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma with increased 18F-FDG uptake // Journal of Nuclear Medicine.— 2005.— Vol. 46, № 10.— С. 1753–1759.
43. Izuishi K. et al. Molecular mechanisms of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in liver cancer // Oncology reports.— 2014.— Vol. 31, № 2.— Р. 701–706.
44. Zeisel S. H., Blusztajn J. K. Choline and human nutrition // Annual review of nutrition.— 1994.— Vol. 14, № 1.— P. 269–296.
45. Ackerstaff E., Glunde K., Bhujwalla Z. M. Choline phospholipid metabolism: a target in cancer cells? // J. of cellular biochemistry.— 2003.— Vol. 90, № 3.— P. 525–533.
46. Araki T. et al. Dynamic CT densitometry of hepatic tumors // American Journal of Roentgenology.— 1980.— Vol. 135, № 5.— Р. 1037–1043. 47. Foley W. D. et al. Contrast enhancement technique for dynamic hepatic computed tomographic scanning // Radiology.— 1983.— Vol. 147, № 3.— Р. 797–803.
47. Mathieu D. et al. Hepatic adenomas and focal nodular hyperplasia: dy na mic CT study // Radiology.— 1986.— Vol. 160, № 1.— Р. 53–58.
48. Miles K. A. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography // The British journal of radiology.— 1991.— Vol. 64, № 761.— Р. 409–412.
49. Rees S. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography // The British journal of radiology.— 1992.— Vol. 65, № 774.— Р. 554–555.
50. Miles K. A., Hayball M. P., Dixon A. K. Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT // Radiology.— 1993.— Vol. 188, № 2.— Р. 405–411.
51. Дударев В. С., Анкифеев В. В. Современная интервенционная радио логия // Новости лучевой диагностики.— 1997.— № 1.— С. 26–27.
52. Prokop M., Galanski M., Van Der Molen A. J. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body.— Thieme, 2003.— Р. 234–237.
53. Asayama Y. et al. Arterial blood supply of hepatocellular carcinoma and histologic grading: radiologic-pathologic correlation // Amer. J. of Roentgenology.— 2008.— Vol. 190, № 1.— P. W28–W34.
54. Tong R. T. et al. Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors // Cancer research.— 2004.— Vol. 64, № 11.— Р. 3731–3736.
55. Ternberg J. L., Butcher H. R. Blood-flow relation between hepatic artery and portal vein // Science.— 1965.— Vol. 150, № 3699.— Р. 1030–1031.
Review
For citations:
Tulin P.E., Dolgushin M.B., Odzharova A.A., Menkov M.A., Medvedeva B.M., Shiryaev S.V., Patyutko Yu.I., Dolgushin B.I. PERFUSION CT AND PET WITH 18F-FDG AND 18F-FCHO IN THE COMPLEX DIAGNOSIS OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2015;(3):59-69. (In Russ.)