Послать статью по эл. почте 
ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ДВУХЭНЕРГЕТИЧЕСКОЙ КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЙ ТОМОГРАФИИ В ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКЕ ОЧАГОВЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ ПЕЧЕНИ
https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2018-4-13-20
Аннотация
Об авторах
А. С. СавельеваРоссия
ассистент кафедры лучевой диагностики ИПО;
врач-рентгенолог рентгенологического отделения,
660022, г. Красноярск, ул. Партизана Железняка, д. 1
Е. А. Карлова
Россия
кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры лучевой диагностики;
врач-рентгенолог рентгенологического отделения,
660022, г. Красноярск, ул. Партизана Железняка, д. 1
А. В. Протопопов
Россия
доктор медицинских наук, заведующий кафедрой лучевой диагностики ИПО,
660022, г. Красноярск, ул. Партизана Железняка, д. 1
Н. А. Меркулова
Россия
заведующая рентгенологическим отделением,
660113, г. Красноярск, 1-я Смоленская ул., д. 16
З. М. Тяжельникова
Россия
кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры лучевой диагностики ИПО,
660022, г. Красноярск, ул. Партизана Железняка, д. 1
Список литературы
1. Patino M., Prochowski A., Agrawal M.D. et al. Material separation using dual-energy CT: Current and emerging applications // Radiographics. 2016. Vol. 36. P. 1087–1105.
2. De Cecco C.N., Schoepf U.J., Steinbach L. et al. White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 3: Vascular, Cardiac, Pulmonary, and Musculoskeletal Applications // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2016. Vol. 41. P. 1–7.
3. De Cecco C.N., Darnell A., Rengo M. et al. Dual-energy CT: oncologic applications // AJR. 2012. Vol. 199, No 5. Р. 98–105.
4. Johnson T.R.C. Dual-Energy CT: general principles // AJR. 2012. Vol. 199. P. 3–8.
5. Silva A.C., Morse B.G., Hara A.K. et al. Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging // Radiographics. 2011. Vol. 31. (4). P. 1031–1046.
6. Bolus D.N. Dual-Energy Computed Tomographic Scanners: Principles, Comparisons, and Contrasts // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2013. Vol. 37. P. 944–947.
7. Mc Collough C.H., Leng S., Yu L., Fletcher J.G. Dual- and multiEnergy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications // Radiology. 2015. Vol. 276. P. 637–653.
8. De Cecco C.N., Darnell A., Macías N. et al. Second-generation dual-energy computed tomography of the abdomen: radiation dose comparison with 64- and 128-row single-energy acquisition // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2013. Vol. 37 (4). P. 543–546.
9. Kaza R.K., Raff E.A., Davenport M.S. et al. Virtual Unenhanced Images Generated Using Multimaterial Decomposition from Fast Kilovoltage-switching Dual-energy CT // Acad. Radiol. 2017. Vol. 24 (3). P. 365–372.
10. Kaufmann S., Sauter A., Spira D. et al. Tin-filter enhanced dualenergy-CT: image quality and accuracy of CT numbers in virtual noncontrast imaging // Acad. Radiol. 2013. Vol. 20. P. 596–603.
11. Ananthakrishnan L., Rajiah P., Ahn R. et al. Spectral detector CTderived virtual noncontrast images: comparison of attenuation values with unenhanced CT // Abdominal Radiology. 2017. Vol. 42 (3). P. 702–709.
12. Siegel M.J., Kaza R.K., Bolus D.N. et al. White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on DualEnergy CT, Part 1: Technology and Terminology // J. Comput. Assist. Tomog. 2016. Vol. 40. P. 841–845.
13. Foley W.D., Shuman W.P., Siegel M.J. et al. White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 2: Radiation Dose and Iodine Sensitivity // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2016. Vol. 40. P. 846–850.
14. Grajo J.R., Patino M., Prochowski A. et al. Dual energy CT in practice: basic principles and applications // Appl. Radiol. 2016. P. 6–12.
15. Sosna J., Mahgerefteh S., Goshen L. et al. Virtual nonenhanced abdominal dual-energy MDCT: Analysis of image characteristics // World J. Radiol. 2012. Vol. 4 (4). P. 167–173.
16. Tian S.F., Liu A.L., Liu J.H. et al. Application of computed tomography Virtual Noncontrast Spectral Imaging in evaluation of hepatic metastases: a preliminary study // Chin. Med. J. 2015. Vol. 128, Issue 5. P. 610–614.
17. Lee S.H., Lee J.M., Kim K.W. et al. Dual-energy computed tomography to assess tumor response to hepatic radiofrequency ablation: potential diagnostic value of virtual noncontrast images and iodine maps // Invest. Radiol. 2011. Vol. 46 (2). P. 77–84.
18. De Cecco C.N., Boll D.T., Bolus D.N. et al. White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 4: Abdominal and Pelvic Applications // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2017. Vol. 41, No 1. P. 8–14.
19. Stolzmann P., Frauenfelder T., Pfammatter T. et al. Endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: detection with dualenergy dual-source CT // Radiology. 2008. Vol. 249. P. 682–691.
20. Lago K.N., Vallejos J., Capunay C. et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for the detection of focal liver lesions. Tomografía computada de doble energía para la detección de lesiones focales hepáticas // Radiología. 2017. Vol. 59 (4). P. 306–312.
21. Caruso D., De Cecco C.N., Schoepf U.J. et al. Can dual-energy CT improve visualization of hypoenhancing liver lesions in portal venous phase? Assessment of advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic images // J. Clin. Imaging. 2016. Vol. 41. P. 118–124.
22. Morgan D.E. The Role of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Assessment of Abdominal Oncology and Beyond // Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2018. Vol. 56. P. 565–585.
23. Wang Q., Shi G., Qi X. et al. Quantitative analysis of the dual-energy CT virtual spectral curve for focal liver lesions characterization // Eur. J. Radiology. 2014. Vol. 83 (10). P. 1759–1764.
24. Xin X., Zhu B., Chen J. et al. The use of spectral CT imaging in characterization of pleural fluid: a new method to differentiate transudates from exudates // Chin. J. Radiol. 2011. Vol. 45 (8). P. 723–726.
25. Kim K.S., Lee J.M., Kim S.H. et al. Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography for detection of hypervascular liver hepatocellular carcinoma: phantom and preliminary studies // Invest. Radiol. 2010. Vol. 45. P. 149–157.
26. Deleslle M. A., Pontana F., Duhamel A. et al. Spectral optimization of chest CT angiography with reduced iodine load: experience in 80 patients evaluated with dual-source, dual-energy CT // Radiology. 2013. Vol. 267 (1). P. 256–266.
27. Patino M., Prochowski A., Agrawal M. D. Material separation using Dual-Energy CT: current and emerging applications // Radiographics. 2016. Vol. 36. P. 1087–1105.
28. Laroia S.T., Bhadoria A.S., Venigalla Y. et al. Role of dual energy spectral computed tomography in characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Initial experience from a tertiary liver care institute // Eur. J. Radiology Open. 2016. Vol. 3. P. 162–171.
29. Kartalis N., Brehmer K., Loizou L. Multi-detector CT: Liver protocol and recent developments // Eur. J. Radiol. 2017. Vol. 97. P. 101–109.
30. Anzideia M., Di Martino M., Sacconi B. et al. Evaluation of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT datasets in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma // Clin. Radiol. 2015. Vol. 70. P. 966–973.
31. Hayashi M., Matsui O., Ueda K. et al. Progression to hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with intranodular blood supply evaluated with CT during intraarterial injection of contrast material // Radiology. 2002. Vol. 225. P. 143–149.
32. Zhang Y., Tang J., Xu J. et al. Analysis of pulmonary pure groundglass nodule in enhanced dual energy CT imaging for predicting invasive adenocarcinoma: comparing with conventional thin-section CT imaging // J. Thorac. Dis. 2017. Vol. 9 (12). P. 4967–4978.
33. Peijie Lv., Lin X.Z., Li J. et al. Differentiation of small hepatic hemangioma from small hepatocellular carcinoma: recently introduced spectral CT method // Radiology. 2011. Vol. 259 (3). P. 720–729.
34. Jiang T., Zhu A.X., Sahani D.V. Established and novel imaging biomarkers for assessing response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma // J. Hepatol. 2013. Vol. 58 (1). P. 169–177.
35. Dai Ch., Cao Y., Jia Y. et al. Differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes with different iodine quantification methods using singlephase contrast-enhanced dualenergy CT: areal vs. volumetric analyses // Abdom Radiol. 2018. Vol. 43 (3). P. 672–678.
36. Mengsu Z., Zhou J., Brook O.R. et al. Split-Bolus spectral multidetector CT of the Pancreas: assessment of radiation dose and tumor conspicuity // Radiology. 2013. Vol. 269 (1). P. 139–148
37. Morgan D.E., Weber A.C., Lockhart M.E. et al. Differentiation of high lipid content from low lipid content adrenal lesions using single-source rapid kilovolt (peak)-switching dual-energy multidetector CT // Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2013. Vol. 37 (6). P. 937–943.
38. Yu Y., Lin X., Chen K. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: differentiation with CT spectral imaging // Eur. Radiol. 2013. Vol. 23. P. 1660–1668.
39. Yu Y., He N., Sun K. et al. Differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from angiomyolipoma of the liver with CT spectral imaging: a preliminary study // Clin. Radiol. 2013. Vol. 68 (9). P. 491–497.
40. Hayashi M., Matsui O., Ueda K. et al. Progression to hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with intranodular blood supply evaluated with CT during intraarterial injection of contrast material // Radiology. 2002. Vol. 225. P. 143–149.
41. Matsui O. Imaging of multistep human hepatocarcinogenesis by CT during intra-arterial contrast injection // Intervirology. 2004. Vol. 47. P. 271–276.
42. Nattenmüller J., Hosch W., Nguyen T.T., Skornitzke S. Hypodense liver lesions in patients with hepatic steatosis: do we profit from dual-energy computed tomography? // Eur. Soc. Radiol. 2015. Vol. 25. P. 3567–3576.
43. Muenzel D., Grace C.L., Hei Sh.Y. et al. Material density iodine images in dual-energy CT: Detection and characterization of hypervascular liver lesions compared to magnetic resonance imaging // European Journal of Radiology. 2017. Vol. 95. P. 300–306.
44. Pfeiffer D., Parakh A., Patino M. et al. Iodine material density images in dual-energy CT: quantification of contrast uptake and washout in HCC // Abdom. Radiol. 2018. Vol. 43. P. 3317–3323.
Дополнительные файлы
Для цитирования: Савельева А.С., Карлова Е.А., Протопопов А.В., Меркулова Н.А., Тяжельникова З.М. ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ДВУХЭНЕРГЕТИЧЕСКОЙ КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЙ ТОМОГРАФИИ В ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКЕ ОЧАГОВЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ ПЕЧЕНИ. Лучевая диагностика и терапия. 2018;(4):13-20. https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2018-4-13-20
For citation: Saveleva A.S., Karlova E.A., Protopopov A.V., Merkulova N.A., Tyazhelnikova Z.M. POSSIBILITIES OF DUALENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF FOCAL LESIONS OF THE LIVER. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2018;(4):13-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2018-4-13-20
Обратные ссылки
- Обратные ссылки не определены.
