Preview

Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy

Advanced search

Magnetic resonance morphometry of the brain in different variants of multisystem atrophy

https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-1-33-37

Abstract

Introduction. Neurodegenerative diseases occupy a significant place in the structure of diseases of the Central nervous system and have a high social and economic significance. One of the methods of more accurate neuroimaging assessment of the neurodegenerative process is magnetic resonance morphometry using specialized software. Purpose of research. To evaluate the possibilities of magnetic resonance morphometry as a method of differential diagnosis of parkinsonism syndromes and to investigate the characteristic of volumetric changes of individual brain structures in different variants of Multisystem atrophy. Materials and methods. Morphometric markers of Multisystem atrophy variants development using postprocessing processing of native MRI on Freesurfer software are analyzed. 24 patients with striatonigral degeneration and 20 patients with olivopontocerebellar degeneration were examined. Patients without relevant neurological pathology of appropriate age were examined as a control group. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on a magnetic resonance tomograph of Siemens with magnetic field induction of 1,5 T. 240 structures from the right and left hemispheres of the brain were subjected to statistical analysis. There were significant differences in the distribution of atrophy among the structures of the brain stem and hemispheres in patients with olivopontocerebellar and striatonigral degeneration. Сonclusions. The obtained data of the study on the atrophy of cortical areas involved in the realization of cognitive functions showed the difference between the variants of Multisystem atrophy. Thus, striatonigral atrophy is characterized by a decrease in the thickness of the structures of the frontal cortex, while olivopontocerebellar degeneration reveals a decrease in the thickness of the parahippocampal zone. Methods of postprocessing processing of MR morphometry data allow to confirm the clinical diagnosis instrumentally, as well as to clarify the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and to clarify the distribution of the brain structures most susceptible to neurodegeneration.

About the Authors

E. V. Iskhakova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Elnara V. Iskhakova

St. Petersburg



A. G. Trufanov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

Artem G. Trufanov

St. Petersburg



A. A. Yurin
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

Anton A. Yurin

St. Petersburg



A. S. Lepekhina
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Anna S. Lepekhina

St. Petersburg



A. Yu. Efimtsev
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Aleхander Yu. Efimtsev

St. Petersburg



V. A. Fokin
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Fokin

St. Petersburg



References

1. Levin O.S., Fedorova N.V., Shtok V.N. Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2003, Vol. 103, No. 2, pp. 54–60 (In Russ.)

2. Voronkov L.V., Trufanov A.G., Litvinenko I.V. Possibilities of voxel-based morphometry in the diagnosis of non-tumorous diseases of the brain. Herald of the Russian Academy of Military Medicine, 2012, No. 1 (37), pp. 203–207 (In Russ.)

3. Trufanov A.G., Litvinenko I.V. The capabilities of MRI in the diagnosis and assessment of progression of Parkinson’s disease. Guidelines for physicians on the materials of the III National Congress on Parkinson’s diseaseease and movement disorders (with international participation), Мoscow: Publisher Scientific Center of Neurology RAMS, 2014, pp. 126–133 (In Russ.)

4. Brenneis C., Boesch S.M., Egger K.E. Cortical atrophy in the cerebellar variant of multiple system atrophy: a voxel‐based morphometry study // Movement Disord. 2006. Vol. 21. P. 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20656.

5. Brenneis C., Seppi K., Schocke M.F. Voxel‐based morphometry detects cortical atrophy in the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy // Movement Disord. 2003. Vol. 18. P. 1132–1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.10502.

6. Messina D., Cerasa A., Condino F. Patterns of brain atrophy in Parkinson’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy // Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011. Vol. 17. P. 172–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.12.010.

7. Minnerop M., Specht K., Ruhlmann J. Voxel‐based morphometry and voxel‐based relaxometry in multiple system atrophy — a comparison between clinical subtypes and correlations with clinical parameters // Neuroimage. 2007. Vol. 36. P. 1086–1095. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.028.

8. Scherfler C., Göbel G., Müller C. Diagnostic potential of automated subcortical volume segmentation in atypical parkinsonism // Neurology. 2016. Vol. 86. P. 1242–1249. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002518.


Review

For citations:


Iskhakova E.V., Trufanov A.G., Yurin A.A., Lepekhina A.S., Efimtsev A.Yu., Fokin V.A. Magnetic resonance morphometry of the brain in different variants of multisystem atrophy. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2020;11(1):33-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-1-33-37

Views: 2068


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-5343 (Print)