Preview

Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy

Advanced search

CARDIAC RISK ASSESSMENT BEFORE NON-CARDIAC SURGERY

https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2016-1-17-24

Abstract

The preoperative cardiac risk assessment of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery is common daily practice of medical consultants. At present, there are several noninvasive diagnostic methods for cardiac risk evaluation. In daily practice, common used methods are stress test with myocardial imaging (stress-Echo; myocardial perfusion imaging with gated-SPECT, etc.). Recently, some studies demonstrated that both coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance with stress test have a good prognostic value in cardiac risk evaluation. A common question that arises between medical specialists in preoperative assessment is which of noninvasive diagnostic methods should use for cardiac risk evaluation. The easiest one is standard stress test. However, the preoperative evaluation has some difficulties in elderly because of reduced physical activity and inability to achieve the submaximal heart rate during stress test. For this category of patients, stress test with pharmacological agents followed by gated-SPECT or Echo-CG is to be considered. This article provides medical specialists to assess cardiac risk with appropriate non-invasive diagnostic methods in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

About the Authors

M. . Vakhromeeva
Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center
Russian Federation


V. . Tyurin
Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center
Russian Federation


F. . Chanakhchian
Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center
Russian Federation


E. . Denisenko-Kankiya
Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center
Russian Federation


References

1. DeFrances C. J., Lucas C. A., Buie V. C., Golosinskiy A. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey // Natl. Health Stat. Report.- 2008.- Vol. 30, № 5.- Р. 1-20.

2. Hamel M. B., Henderson W. G., Khuri S. F., Daley J. Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery // J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.- 2005.- Vol. 53.- Р. 424-429.

3. Turrentine F. E., Wang H., Simpson V. B., Jones R. S. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients // J. Am. Coll. Surg.- 2006.- Vol. 203.- Р. 865-877.

4. Kulaylat M. N., Dayton M. T. Surgical complications // Townsend C. M. Jr., Beauchamp R. D., Evers B. M., Mattox K. L. Sabiston textbook of surgery.- 18th ed.- Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2008.- Р 338-347.

5. Woon V. C., Lim K. H. Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly-differences compared with the young // Singapore Med. J.- 2003.- Vol. 44, № 8.- Р 414-418.

6. Malhotra S., Sharma R., Kliner D. E. et al. Relationship between silent myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease risk factors // J. Nucl. Cardiol.- 2013.- Vol. 20.- P 731-738.

7. Baldasseroni, S., Pratesi A., Orso F. et al. Age-related impact of depressive symptoms on functional capacity measured with 6-minute walking test in coronary artery disease // Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol.- 2014.- Vol. 21, № 5.- P 647-654.

8. Mandolini C., Tornini A., Borgia M. C. About cardiovascular risk in non-cardiac surgery // Ann. Ital. Med. Int.- 2004.- Vol. 19.- P. 262-268.

9. Arora V., Velanovich V., Alarcon W. Preoperative assessment of cardiac risk and perioperative cardiac management in noncardiac surgery // Int. J. of Surgery.- 2011.- Vol. 9, № 23.- P 28.

10. Kristensen S. D., Knuuti J., Saraste A. et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) // Eur. Heart J.- 2014.- Vol. 35.- P 2383-2431.

11. Fleisher L. A., Fleischmann K. E., Auerbach A. D. et al. 2014 ACC/AHA Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.- 2014.- Vol. 64, № 22.- P 77-137.

12. Сумин А. Н. Оценка и снижение риска кардиальных осложнений при некардиальных операциях: есть ли необходимость пересмотра рекомендаций? // Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии.- 2013.- Т. 9, № 5.- С. 570-576.

13. Барбараш Л. С., Сумин О. Л., Барбараш С. В. Оценка и коррекция периоперационного риска развития сердечно-сосудистых осложнений при некардиальных операциях // Кардиология.- 2012.- Т. 5.- С. 77-87.

14. Щукин Ю. В., Хохлунов С. М., Суркова Е. А. и др. Прогнозирование и профилактика кардиальных осложнений внесердечных хирургических вмешательств // Национальные рекомендации ВНОК, 2011.- 28 с.

15. Goldman L., Caldera D. L., Nussbaum S. R. et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures // N. Engl. J. Med.- 1977.- Vol. 297.- P 845-850.

16. Detsky A. S., Abrams H. B., Forbath N. et al. Cardiac assessment for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. A multifactorial clinical risk index // J. R. Arch. Intern. Med.- 1986.- Vol. 146.- P. 2131-2134.

17. Lee T. H., Marcantonio E. R., Mangione C. M. et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery // Circulation.- 1999.- Vol. 100.- P. 1043-1049.

18. Шиндяпина Н. В. Использование индекса Lee для оценки кардиального риска плановых оперативных вмешательств у пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста // Бюллетень медицинских Интернет-конференций.- 2014.- Т. 4, № 5.- С. 716.

19. Gupta P. K., Gupta H., Sundaram A. et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery // Circulation.- 2011.- Vol. 124.- P 381-387.

20. Thomas D., Anderson D., Hulten E. et al. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Incidence of cardiovascular events in 632 patients in a department of defense cohort over 6-year follow-up // Vascular.- 2014.- Vol. 23, № 3.- Р 234-239.

21. Boersma E., Kertai M. D., Schouten O. et al. Periooperative cardiovascular mortality in noncardiac surgery: Validation of the Lee cardiac risk index // Am. J. Med.- 2005.- Vol. 118.- P 1134-1141.

22. Reilly D. F., McNeely M. J., Doerner D. et аі Self-reported exercise tolerance and risk of serious perioperative complications // Arch. Intern. Med.- 1999.- Vol. 159, № 18.- P 2185-2192.

23. Montalescot G., Sechtem U., Achenbach S. et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology: 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease // Eur. Heart J. - 2013.- Vol. 34, № 38.- P 2949-3003.

24. Wolk M. J., Bailey S. R., Doherty J. U. et al. CCF/AHA/ASE/ ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.- 2014.- Vol. 63.- P 380-406.

25. Gibbons R. J., Balady G. J., Bricker J. T. et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.- 2002.- Vol. 40, № 8.- P. 1531-1540.

26. Rai M., Baker W. L., Parker M. W., Heller G. V. Meta-Analysis of Optimal Risk Stratification in Patients >65 Years of Age // Am. J. Cardiol.- 2012.- Vol. 110, № 8.- P. 1092-1099.

27. Либби П., Боноу Р. О., Манн Д. Л., Зайпс Д. П. Болезни сердца по Браунвальду: руководство по сердечно-сосудистой медицине.- Т. 1.- М.: Рид Элсивер, 2010.- 624 с.

28. Lancellotti P., Plońska-Goṡciniak E., Garbi M. Cardiovascular imaging practice in Europe: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging // Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. - 2015.- Vol. 16, № 7.- P 697-702.

29. Галявин А. С., Рафиков А. Ю., Сайфуллина Г. Б. Сравнительный анализ данных эхокардиографии, мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии и перфузионной сцинтиграфии миокарда в оценке объема и фракции выброса левого желудочка // Казанский мед. журн.- 2012.- Т. 1.- С. 39-43.

30. Taqueti V R., Di Carli M. F. Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Evaluation of Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease in the Era of Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging // Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis.- 2015.- Vol. 57, № 6.- Р. 644-653.

31. Turchetti G., Kroes M. A., Lorenzoni V. The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic cardiac imaging for stable coronary artery disease // Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res.- 2015.- Vol. 15, № 4.- P 625-633.

32. Dong W., Wang Q., Gu S. et al. Cardiac hybrid SPECT/CTA imaging to detect «functionally relevant coronary artery lesion»: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization? // Ann. Nucl. Med.- 2014.- Vol. 28, № 2.- P. 88-93.

33. Кузнецов В. А., Ярославская Е. И., Горбатенко Е. А. Предикторы гемодинамически значимых коронарных стенозов у пациентов с нарушениями миокардиальной перфузии по данным однофотонной эмиссионной компьютерной томографии миокарда // Клин. мед.- 2012.- Т. 7.- С. 25-30.

34. Ogino Y., Horiguchi Y., Ueda T. et al. A myocardial perfusion imaging system using a multifocal collimator for detecting coronary artery disease: validation with invasive coronary angiography // Ann. Nucl. Med.- 2015.- Vol. 29, № 4.- Р. 366-370.

35. Сергиенко В. Б., Аншелес А. А., Шульгин Д. Н. и др. Перфузионная сцинтиграфия и ОЭКТ миокарда // Кардиологический вестник.- 2015.- Т. 2.- С. 6-21.

36. Thai J. N., Abidov A., Jie T., Krupinski E., Kuo P. H. Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging versus Stress Echocardiography in the Preoperative Evaluation of Patients for Kidney Transplantation // J. Nucl. Med. Technol.- 2015 - Vol. 43, № 3.- Р. 201-205.

37. Гайсёнок О. В., Марцевич С. Ю. Определение показаний к проведению коронарографии у пациентов без клинических проявлений заболевания и больных со стабильной стенокардией // Кардиология.- 2014.- Т. 10.- С. 57-61.

38. Kaminek M., Metelkovâ I., Budtkovâ M. et al. Diagnosis of high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease by combined cardiac gated SPET imaging and coronary calcium score // Hell. J. Nucl. Med.- 2015.- Vol. 18, № 1.- Р 31-34.

39. Miller T. D., Askew J. W., Anavekar N. S. Nonivasive Stress Testing for Coronary Artery disease // Heart Fail. Clin.- 2016.- Vol. 12, № 1.- P. 65-82.

40. Bateman T. M., O'Keefe J. H. Jr., Dong V. M., Barnhart C., Ligon R. W. Coronary angiographic rates after stress single-photon emission computed tomographic scintigraphy // J. Nucl. Cardiol.- 1995.- Vol. 2, № 3.- P. 217-223.


Review

For citations:


Vakhromeeva M., Tyurin V., Chanakhchian F., Denisenko-Kankiya E. CARDIAC RISK ASSESSMENT BEFORE NON-CARDIAC SURGERY. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2016;(1):17-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2016-1-17-24

Views: 710


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-5343 (Print)