Possibilities of CT perfusion in renal tumor cryoablation: а retrospective study
https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2026-17-1-55-65
Abstract
Introduction: Modern surgical treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is focused on organ-preserving methods, including ablative technologies (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation). Despite the safety of ablative methods, the risk of incomplete ablation and local recurrence of kidney tumors remains, necessitating effective tools for early diagnosis. Perfusion computed tomography (CTP) offers the possibility of quantitative assessment of microcirculation in the ablation zone and detection of preserved vascularization.
Objective: To analyze the potential of CTP for assessing the treatment effect of renal tumor cryoablation in the early and longterm postoperative periods.
Materials and methods: The study analyzed data from standard multiphase computed tomography (Std-CT) and CTP of 40 patients with renal cell carcinoma aged 36–76 years before, on days 5–7, and 3 months after cryoablation. Based on CT results, 37 patients were determined to have complete ablation of the tumor node, and 3 patients had incomplete ablation. Arterial flow (AF), blood volume (BV), and vascular wall permeability (CL) in the tumor area were assessed.
Results: In the group of patients with complete cryoablation (n=37), a statistically significant decrease in maximum CT density and perfusion parameters (BV, AF, CL) of the tumor was revealed on days 5–7 and 3 months after the procedure, reflecting ischemic changes and regression of tumor tissue. In patients with incomplete tumor ablation in the early postoperative period, areas of hyperperfusion in the cryodestruction zone were visualized, and a slight decrease in maximum densitometric values (HU) and perfusion parameters (BV, AF, CL) in the tumor node was noted. During follow-up at 3 months (n=2), an increase in density and a further rise in perfusion parameters in the residual tumor were detected, indicating preserved angiogenesis.
Discussion: The results of this study are consistent with the works of other authors and confirm that CTP can serve as an additional technique for monitoring after renal tumor cryoablation. A decrease in CTP parameters in the cryoablation zone indicated complete destruction of the tumor node, while an increase in CTP values in local areas of the postoperative region indicated the preservation of viable tumor cells and served as an indicator of their activity, which was expressed in the presence of residual tumor.
Conclusion: CT perfusion allows for assessing the treatment effect of cryoablation in the early postoperative period by evaluating changes in the quantitative characteristics of the microcirculatory bed in the solid component of the kidney tumor.
About the Authors
T. Yu. LunevaRussian Federation
Tatiana Yu. Luneva – Radiologist of the Computed Tomography Cabinet of the X-ray Diagnostics Department, State-Financed Institution of Rostov Region
Rostov-on-Don, 70/3 Dolomanovsky Pereulok Street
D. S. Luzhanskiy
Russian Federation
Daniil S. Luzhanskiy – Medical Specialist in X-ray Endovascular Methods of Diagnostics and Treatment, State-Financed Institution of Rostov Region
Rostov-on-Don, 70/3 Dolomanovsky Pereulok Street
N. B. Volkonskaya
Russian Federation
Natalya B. Volkonskaya – Head of the X-ray Diagnostics Department, State-Financed Institution of Rostov Region
Rostov-on-Don, 70/3 Dolomanovsky Pereulok Street
S. M. Pakus
Russian Federation
Sergey M. Pakus – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of urologic oncology department, State-Financed Institution of Rostov Region
Rostov-on-Don, 70/3 Dolomanovsky Pereulok Street
I. A. Aboyan
Russian Federation
Igor A. Aboyan – Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Medical Officer, State-Financed Institution of Rostov Region
Rostov-on-Don, 70/3 Dolomanovsky Pereulok Street
V. V. Kapustin
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Kapustin – Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Chair professor of diagnostic radiology and roentgenology at the Medical and Bilogical Innovations and Continuous Education University under the Federal State Budget-funded Institution State Scientific Center of Russian Federation
Moscow, 23, Marshal Novikov str.
References
1. Bahadoram S., Davoodi M., Hassanzadeh S. еt al. Renal cell carcinoma: An overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment // G. Ital. Nefrol. 2022. Vol. 39. Р. 3.
2. Bukavina L., Bensalah K., Bray F. еt al. Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2022 Update // Eur. Urol. 2022. Vol. 82, No. 5. Р. 529–542. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.019.
3. [Kostritskiy S.V., Shirokorad V.I., Semenov D.V. et al. Effectiveness of modern immunotherapy in combination treatment of patients with renal cancer and bone metastases. Cancer Urology, 2024, Vol. 20, Nо. 2, рр. 15–25 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-2-15-25.
4. Escudier B., Porta C., Schmidinger M. et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up // Ann. Oncol. 2019. Vol. 30, No. 5. Р. 706–720. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz056.
5. Gao H., Zhou L., Zhang J. et al. Comparative efficacy of cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis // BMC Cancer. 2024. Vol. 24, Nо. 1150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12917-z.
6. McClure T., Lansing A, Ferko N. et al. A Comparison of Microwave Ablation and Cryoablation for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis // Urology. 2023. Vol. 180. Р. 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.001.
7. Campbell S.C., Clark P.E., Chang S.S. et al. Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: Evaluation, Management, and Follow-Up: AUA Guideline: Part I // J. Urol. 2021. Vol. 206, No. 2. Р. 199–208. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001911.
8. Rosenblad A.K., Hashim B.M., Lindblad P. et al. Recurrences after nephron-sparing treatments of renal cell carcinoma: a competing risk analysis // World J. Urol. 2024. Vol. 42, No. 474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05172-1.
9. Loloi J., Shingleton W.B., Nakada S.Y. et al. Management of Residual or Recurrent Disease Following Thermal Ablation of Renal Cortical Tumors // J. Kidney Cancer VHL. 2020. Vol. 7, No. 2.1. Р.1–5. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.2020.133.
10. Almdalal T., Rosenblad А.К. Predictive characteristics for disease recurrence and overall survival in non-metastatic clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma — results from the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register // Scand. J. Urol. 2023. Vol. 57, No. 1–6. Р. 67–74. doi: 10.1080/21681805.
11. Abu-Ghanem Y., Fernández-Pello S., Bex A. et al. Limitations of Available Studies Prevent Reliable Comparison Between Tumour Ablation and Partial Nephrectomy for Patients with Localised Renal Masses: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Renal Cell Cancer Guideline Panel // Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2020. Vol. 3, No. 4. Р. 433–452. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.02.001.
12. Abou Elkassem А.М., Lo S.S., Gunn A.J. et al. Role of Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Perspective // Radiographics. 2021. Vol. 41, No. 5. Р. 1387–1407. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200202.
13. Squillaci E., Manenti G., Cicciò C. et al. Perfusion-CT monitoring of cryo-ablated renal cells tumors // J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009. Vol. 28, No. 1. Р. 138. http://doi:10.1186/1756-9966-28-138.
14. [Lomonosova E.V., Golbits A.B., Rubtsova N.A. et al. Application of perfusion computed tomography in renal diseases (review of literature). Medical Visualization. 2023. Vol. 27, No 2, рр. 85–98 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1220.
15. [Rubtsova N.A., Golbitc A.B., Kryaneva E.V. et al. The role of CT-perfusion for diagnostic of solid renal tumors. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2021. Vol. 12, No. 2, рр. 70–78 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2021-12-2-70-78.
Review
For citations:
Luneva T.Yu., Luzhanskiy D.S., Volkonskaya N.B., Pakus S.M., Aboyan I.A., Kapustin V.V. Possibilities of CT perfusion in renal tumor cryoablation: а retrospective study. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2026;17(1):55-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2026-17-1-55-65
JATS XML


























