POSTOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND MONITORING SURVEY IN PATIENTS WITH ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS
https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2017-2-18-30
Abstract
The diagnosis of early and late postoperative complication after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery has a bearing on treatment results. Ultrasound duplex scanning must have been effective and accessible for postoperative monitoring, but such studies are inconsiderable in number. The aim is a definition of distinctive ultrasound criteria of postoperative complication and development of monitoring survey protocol. In this study authors analyzed results of assessment in 273 patients after open or endovascular repair in duration up to 102 months. All of the patients were underwent ultrasound duplex scanning including contrast-enhanced studies. All of specific revealed in 27,1% cases complications were divided to early and rate. The postoperative hemorrhage was most frequent (6,2%) among the others such as anastomotic thrombosis and graft infection. Stenotic lesions (8,1%), true and false anastomotic aneurysms (7,7%) were as late complications. The proposed protocol of diagnosis and monitoring conduced a timely detection of complications. In authors’ opinion, ultrasound duplex scanning is noninvasive, cost-effective and valid for postoperative monitoring survey.
About the Authors
N. N. Andreychuk
St. Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
K. A. Andreychuk
The Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine EMERCOM of Russia.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. E. Savello
St. Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Bluth E.I. Ultrasound of the abdominal aorta. Arch. Inter. Med., 1984, Vol. 144, рр. 377–379.
2. Sparks A.R., Johnson P.L., Meyer M.C. Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Am. Fam. Phys., 2002, Vol. 65 (8), рр. 1565–1570.
3. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с аневризмами брюшной аорты: Российский согласительный документ. М., 2013. 176 с. [Nacionalnye rekomendacii po vedeniyu pacientov s anevrizmami bryushnoj aorty: Rossijskij soglasitelnyj dokument. Moscow, 2013, 176 р. (In Russ.)]
4. Андрейчук К.А., Савелло В.Е., Андрейчук Н.Н. Неотложная ультразвуковая диагностика осложненных аневризм брюшной аорты // Скорая медицинская помощь. 2012. T. 13, № 3. С. 42–48. [Andrejchuk K.A., Savello V.E., Andrejchuk N.N. Neotlozhnaya ultrazvukovaya diagnostika oslozhnennyx anevrizm bryushnoj aorty. Skoraya medicinskaya pomoshh. 2012. Vol. 13, No. 3, рр. 42–48. (In Russ.)].
5. Покровский А.В., Гонтаренко В.Н. Состояние сосудистой хирургии в России в 2014 году. М., 2015. 99 с. [Pokrovskij A.V., Gontarenko V.N. Sostoyanie sosudistoj hirurgii v Rossii v 2014 godu. Moscow, 2015, 99 p. (In Russ.)]
6. Zwiebel W.J., Pellerito J. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. Sauders, 2005, 723 p.
7. Ascher E. Haimovici’s Vascular Surgery. 6th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, 1342 p.
8. Palmer P.E.S., Breyer B., Bruguera C.A., et al. Manual of diagnostic ultrasound. Geneva: WHO, 1995, 334 p.
9. Thrush A., Hartshorn T. Peripheral Vascular Ultrasound. How, why and when. Elsevier, 2005, 235 p.
10. Carrafiello G., Recaldini C., Laganà D., et al. Endoleak detection and classification after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of CEUS over CTA. Abdom. Imaging, 2008, Vol. 33 (3), рр. 357–362.
11. Mauro R., Maioli F., Freyrie A., et al. Is CEUS a valid alternative to CTA in endoleak’s detection? Italian J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg., 2010, Vol. 17 (4), рр. 253–258.
Review
For citations:
Andreychuk N.N., Andreychuk K.A., Savello V.E. POSTOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND MONITORING SURVEY IN PATIENTS WITH ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2017;(2):5-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2017-2-18-30
Views:
790
Email this article 