MODELING OF PROBABILITY OF OSTEOPENIC SYNDROME IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIFOCAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS
https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2018-4-74-80
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of the mathematical model for determining the probability of osteopenic syndrome in patients with multifocal atherosclerosis.
Materials and methods. The study included 251 male patients with verified atherosclerosis of the coronary and carotid arteries. The average age of the patients was 60,56±8,7 years. All patients included in the study performed multispiral computed tomography of coronary and carotid arteries with a quantitative evaluation of calcification by the method of Agatston (calcium index and equivalent weight of calcium deposits), color duplex scanning of carotid arteries, densitometry. The obtained data were used to calculate the probability of having an osteopenic syndrome (р) using a mathematical model. Criterion for the risk of osteopenic syndrome in the patient is the value р>0,688. The results of the analysis were compared with the densitometry data chosen as the reference method.
Results. According to the quantitative assessment of coronary artery calcification in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis, significantly higher values of the calcium index and equivalent weight of calcium deposits were observed than in patients with normal bone mineral density. Regardless of the presence of bone mineralization, more than half of the respondents (66,7% of patients with normal bone mineral density and 59,6% of patients with osteopenic syndrome) had coronary artery stenoses up to 50%. Calcification and presence of stenosis more than 30% of carotid arteries prevailed in the group of patients with osteopenic syndrome. The results of calculating the probability of having an osteopenic syndrome using a mathematical model indicate that it is highly prevalent in the sample (69,3%) and does not differ significantly from the densitometry data (70,1%). The sensitivity of the mathematical model was 89,8%, the specificity was 78,7%, the prognostic value of the positive result was 90,8%, the prognostic value of the negative result was 76,6%.
Conclusion. The mathematical model for assessing the probability of osteopenic syndrome is highly diagnostic in men with multifocal atherosclerosis.
About the Authors
A. N. KokovRussian Federation
Kemerovo
V. L. Masenko
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
A. V. Voronkina
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
T. A. Raskina
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
A G. Chernobay
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
S E. Semenov
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
O. L. Barbarash
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
References
1. Johnell O., Kanis J.A., Oden A. et al. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures // Osteoporosis Int. 2004. Vol. 15. P. 38–42.
2. Lesnyak O.M., Benevolenskaya L.I. Osteoporoz v Rossijskoj Federacii: Problemy i perspektivy. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya, 2010, No. 5, pp. 14–18 (In Russ.).
3. Tintut Y., Parhami F., Tsingotjidou A. et al. 8-Isoprostaglandin E2 enhances receptor-activated NFkappa B ligand (RANKL)-dependent osteoclastic potential of marrow hematopoietic precursors via the cAMP pathway // J. Biol. Chem. 2002. Vol. 277, Nо. 16. P. 14221–14226.
4. Golovkin A.S., Kokov A.N., Masenko V. et al. Markers of calcium and phosphate metabolism and osteopenic syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease // Panminerva Medica. 2016. Vol. 58. P. 253–262.
5. Broussard D.L., Magnus J.H. Coronary heart disease risk and bone mineral density among U.S. women and men // J. Women’s Health. 2008. Vol. 17. P. 479–490.
6. Doherty T.M., Fitzpatrick L.A., Inoue D. et al. Molecular, Endocrine, and Genetic Mechanisms of Arterial Calcification // Endocr. Rev. 2004. Vol. 25. P. 629–672.
7. Kokov A.N., Masenko V.L., Tarasov R.S., Barbarash O.L. Ocenka porazheniya koronarnyh arterij u muzhchin s osteopenicheskim sindromom i ishemicheskoj bolezn’yu serdca. Terapevticheskij arhiv. 2014, No. 3, рр. 65–70 (In Russ.).
8. Patent 2624816 Ros. Federaciya: MPK A 61 V 10/00. Sposob opredeleniya veroyatnosti razvitiya osteopenicheskogo sindroma u bol’nyh s mul’tifokal’nym aterosklerozom [Tekst] / A. N. Kokov, V. L. Masenko, S. E. Semenov, E. S. Kagan; zayavitel’ i patentoobladatel’ Federal’noe gosudarstvennoe byudzhetnoe nauchnoe uchrezhdenie «Nauchno-issledovatel’skij institut kompleksnyh problem serdechno-sosudistyh zabolevanij» (RU). № 2016130903; zayavl. 26.07.16; opubl. 06.07.17, Byul. No. 19. 10 р. (In Russ.).
9. Bokeriya L.A. Lekcii po serdechno-sosudistoi hirurgii. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo NCSSKH im. A. N. Bakuleva RAMN, 2013. 764 р. (In Russ.).
10. Benevolenskaya L.I., Mihailova E.E. Ehpidemiologiya osteoporoza i perelomov: rukovodstvo po osteoporozu. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo BINOM, 2003, рр. 10–53 (In Russ.).
11. Marova E.I. Klassifikaciya osteoporoza. Osteoporoz i osteopatii, 1998, No. 1, рр 8–12 (In Russ.).
12. Rozhinskaya L.Yа. Sistemnyj osteoporoz: prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Mokeev, 2000. 196 р. (In Russ.).
13. Masenko V.L., Semenov S.E., Kokov A.N. Aterokal’cinoz i osteoporoz. Svyazi i usloviya vzaimnogo vliyaniya. Obzor. Kompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistyh zabolevanij, 2017, Vol. VI, No. 2, рр. 93–102 (In Russ.).
14. Kolpinskij G.I., Zaharov I.S. Postmenopauzal’nyj osteoporoz (faktory riska, diagnostika, prognozirovanie). Kemerovo: Izdatel’stvo INT. 245 р. (In Russ.).
15. Sveshnikov A.A., Astapenkov D.S. Porogovye velichiny mineral’noj plotnosti kostej skeleta i chastota perelomov. Genij ortopedii, 2010, No. 2, рр. 85– 90. (In Russ.).
16. Farhat G.N., Cauley J.A. The link between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease // Clin. Cases Mineral Bone Metabolism. 2008. Vol. 5, No. 1. Р. 19–34.
17. Hyder J.A., Allison M.A., Criqui M.H. et al. Clinical Investigations Association between Systemic Calcified Atherosclerosis and Bone Density // Calcified Tissue Int. 2007. Vol. 80. Р. 301–306.
Review
For citations:
Kokov A.N., Masenko V.L., Voronkina A.V., Raskina T.A., Chernobay A.G., Semenov S.E., Barbarash O.L. MODELING OF PROBABILITY OF OSTEOPENIC SYNDROME IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIFOCAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2018;(4):74-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2018-4-74-80