Evaluation of the interchangeability of volumetric lung emphysema quantification: comparative analysis of the evaluation results using different software products
https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-4-37-43
Abstract
The aim of this study: to assess the ability of different software products to automated volumetric quantification of lung emphysema and see whether the results can be interconvertible.
Materials and methods. This study is based on the results of recognition and analysis of computer tomograms using three different software products.
Results: all the programs we used have high sensitivity and specificity in recognition of lung emphysema. However, there are a number of errors that prevent accurate image analysis.
Conclusions. The interconvertibility of the results of the automated volumetric quantification of lung emphysema at this stage is not reliably determined and depends on the choice of software products used for analysis.
About the Authors
P. V. Gavrilov
St. Petersburg State Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology; St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel V. Gavrilov.
St. Petersburg.
N. A. Griva
St. Petersburg State Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezda A. Griva.
St. Petersburg.
E. A. Torkatyuk
St. Petersburg State Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena A. Torkatyuk.
St. Petersburg.
References
1. Meldo A.A., Utkin L.V., Trofimova T.N., Ryabinin M.A., Moiseenko V.M., Shelekhova K.V. Novel approaches to development of artificial intelligence algorithms in the lung cancer diagnostics. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy, 2019, Vol. 10. No. 1, pp. 8-18 (In Russ.). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2019-10-1-8-18.
2. Lynch D.A., Moore C.M., Wilson C. et al. CT-based Visual Classification of Emphysema: Association with Mortality in the COPDGene Study // Radiology. 2018. Vol. 288, No. 3. Р. 859-866. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172294.
3. Tyurin I. Е. Computed tomography of the chest. Practical pulmonology, 2003, No. 3, рр. 11-15 (In Russ.).
4. Fischer A.M., Varga-Szemes A., van Assen M. et al. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Based Fully Automatic Chest CT Emphysema Quantification to Pulmonary Function Testing // AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. Vol. 214, No. 5, рр. 1065-1071. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21572.
5. Trovimova T.N., Karlova N.A., Ratnikov V.A., Lukina O.V. et al. Modern RADS classifications and principles for constructing a conclusion. St. Petersburg, 2018, рр. 3169 (In Russ.).
6. Coursergue J.L. Spirographic study of alveolar emphysema and so-called «emphysematous» states. Practical diagnosis and attempted quantification // Maroc. Med. 1964. Vol. 43. Р. 713-722.
7. Dunnill M.S. Emphysema: The Classification and Quantification of Emphysema // Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1969. Oct; Vol. 62, No. 10. Р. 1024-1027.
8. Hayhurst M.D., MacNee W., Flenley D.C. et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema by computerised tomography // Lancet. 1984. Vol. 2, No. 8398. Р. 320-322. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92689-8.
9. Daghfous J., Beji M., Kanoun N. et al. Emphysemepulmonaire: quantification par tomodensitometrie et correlations avec les epreuvesfonctionnellesrespiratories [Pulmonary emphysema: quantification using computed tomography and correlations with respiratory function tests] // Rev. Mal. Respir. 1993. Vol. 10, No. 4. Р. 299-305.
10. Thurlbeck W.M., Muller N.L. Emphysema: definition, imaging, and quantification // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1994. Vol. 163, No. 5. Р. 1017-1025. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976869.
11. Willemink M.J., de Jong P.A., Leiner T. et al. Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: technical principles // Eur. Radiol. 2013. Vol. 23, No. 6. Р. 1623-1631. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2765-y.
12. Den Harder A.M., de Boer E., Lagerweij S.J. et al. Emphysema quantification using chest CT: influence of radiation dose reduction and reconstruction technique // Eur. Radiol. Exp. 2018. Vol. 2, No. 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0064-3.
13. Baumueller S., Winklehner A., Karlo C. et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions // Eur. Radiol. 2012. Vol. 22, No. 12. Р. 2597-2606. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2524-0.
14. Hosny A. et al. Artificial intelligence in radiology // Nature Reviews Cancer. 2018. Vol. 18, No. 8. Р. 500-510.
15. Madani A., Zanen J., de Maertelaer V., Gevenois P.A. Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi-detector row CT-comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry // Radiology. 2006. Vol. 238, No. 3. Р. 1036-1043. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2382042196.
Review
For citations:
Gavrilov P.V., Griva N.A., Torkatyuk E.A. Evaluation of the interchangeability of volumetric lung emphysema quantification: comparative analysis of the evaluation results using different software products. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2020;11(4):37-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-4-37-43
Views:
570
Email this article 