CT perfusion and MR-elastography of the pancreas in predicting the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy
https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-4-80-86
Abstract
Purpose. To compare the capabilities of CT perfusion and MR elastography in predicting the risk of developing pancreatic fistula in patients with periampular tumors at the planning stage of pancreatoduodenectomy.
Materials and methods. CT perfusion and MR elastography were performed in 30 patients with no pancreatic diseases and 53 patients with periampular tumors, who were subsequently operated on in the volume of pancreatoduodenectomy.
Results. In patients with periampular tumors in 18 (44%) cases, the perfusion and stiffness indices in the pancreatic parenchyma did not differ from the control group, 35 (85,3%) showed a decrease in the main perfusion parameters, while a moderate increase in stiffness was noted in 23 (65,7%), expressed in 12 (34,3%). Against the background of preventive measures, only 3 (5,6%) patients, in all cases with a «soft» pancreas in the postoperative period, developed a pancreatic fistula.
Conclusion. CT perfusion and MR elastography are highly informative methods of quantitative and qualitative assessment of the pancreatic parenchyma, detection of fibrotic changes, and are effective in predicting the risk of developing pancreatic fistula.
About the Authors
T. N. Trofimova
Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana N. Trofimova.
St. Petersburg.
M. Ya. Belikova
Hospital for War Veterans; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mariya Ya. Belikova.
St. Petersburg.
D. M. Yakovleva
Hospital for War Veterans
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Diana M. Yakovleva.
St. Petersburg.
M. M. Druzina
Hospital for War Veterans
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mariya M. Druzina.
St. Petersburg.
References
1. Kabanov M.Yu., Sementsov K.V., Yakovleva D.M., Alekseev V.V. The Problem of Development Pancreatic Fistula in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenal Resection. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center, 2017, Vol. 12, No. 11, pp. 112-116 (in Russ.).
2. Riall T.S. et al. Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up // Surgery. 2006. Vol. 140, No. 5. P. 764-772. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.04.006.
3. Akhtanin E.A., Kriger A.G. Causes and Prevention of Pancreatic Fistulas after Pancreas Resection. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery, 2014, No. 5, pp. 79-83 (in Russ.).
4. Grozinger G., Grozinger A., Horger M. The Role of Volume Perfusion CT in the Diagnosis of Pathologies of the Pancreas // Rofo. 2014. Vol. 186, No. 12. P. 1082-1093. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384876.
5. Venkatesh S.K., Ehman R.L. Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen // Abdom. Imaging. 2015. Vol. 40, No. 4. P. 745-759. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0315-6.
Review
For citations:
Trofimova T.N., Belikova M.Ya., Yakovleva D.M., Druzina M.M. CT perfusion and MR-elastography of the pancreas in predicting the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2020;11(4):80-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-4-80-86
Views:
654
Email this article 